Prompts
Research synthesiser
turn interview transcripts and field observations into a single Research synthesis page covering themes, friction, problem statement, and success criteria
Output: A single markdown page with four sections — Themes, Friction points, Problem statement, Success criteria — internally consistent because they're produced in one pass.
Paste into a CLARA-enabled chat
CLARA will confirm the route, ask for anything she still needs in one batched question, and show you the draft before filing.
Use CLARA's `research-synthesiser` for <programme name>.What CLARA will ask you for
- Programme name — your programme's name (e.g. SKYPROTECT).
- Track — the slice of the programme this artefact belongs to (workstream, capability area, feature line, etc.), or
Programme-wideif it spans tracks. - Outcome question — what the research was trying to answer (one line — taken from the interview guide if one exists).
- Inputs — CLARA will search the programme's Confluence space for interview transcripts, field/exercise observation notes, operator session notes; prior-knowledge summary on the topic (optional); interview guide used in the field (optional). You can also paste fresh material if it's not in Confluence yet.
Where the output lands
Knowledge Base/{{track}}/Research-synthesis inside your programme's Confluence space.
Tips
- Themes are clusters, not summaries. If a "theme" is just one person's statement restated, it's not a theme — it's a quote.
- The friction table earns its weight when it's sorted. A friction table without rank ordering is a list of complaints; with rank ordering, it's an action queue.
- The problem statement is what separates synthesis from notes. Resist the urge to leave it open-ended — pick the framing the evidence best supports, and name the alternatives explicitly.
- Success criteria written without measurability ("users should feel more confident") aren't success criteria — they're aspirations. Push for "X% of operators complete task Y in Z seconds without secondary confirmation" or similar.
- This page is the single upstream for the rest of the Research phase. Downstream prompts (persona, journey, PRD, etc.) read sections of this page directly — that's why all four sections live together.
Where this fits in the chain
Use after
These prompts produce outputs you can paste as inputs here.
Feeds into
The output of this prompt is consumed by these downstream prompts.
Journey-map drafter
draft a current-state journey map for a persona
Operational-scenario generator
draft an operational scenario from operator research and capability brief
Persona generator
draft a persona from research evidence
PRD generator
draft a v0 PRD from the problem-impact ranking, research synthesis, and prior framing
Problem-impact ranker
consolidate the captured problems for a programme into a single ranked Problem-impact analysis — each problem scored on reach, severity, evidence and leverage, grouped into leverage tiers, so the team knows which problem to build for first
Test-plan generator
draft a complete test plan with scenarios, participants, measurement, and analysis